John Calvin is one of the single most influential figures of Reformation theology. His theological attitudes are reflected even today in the heart and soul of modern Protestantism. While even Eastern Orthodox Christians revere St. Augustine and his countless theological contributions to the Church; it remains true that Western Christianity inherited not only his genius, but his flaws and innovations as well (namely, the filioque). Likewise, Eastern Christians recognize merit in Calvin’s critical objections to the abuses of the Roman Church, as the Eastern Church posed many of these same objections over 500 years earlier. The shame is in the absence of dialogue between Calvin and the Eastern Church which, in facing the Roman Church in solitude without the compass of theological direction, led to a host of Calvin’s own innovations. One seemingly trivial, but philosophically crucial, point of departure from patristic wisdom is Calvin’s rejection of Holy Icons. While Calvin realized the error in Rome’s evolved state of superstition, his flee from such errors led him quickly past truth and into a state of iconoclasm much worse than the amendable condition of Rome. For reasons partially pragmatic, Calvin chose the road of innovation rather than counsel. And while you might expect this sort of decision to cause a humble man to leave some issues unaddressed, Calvin acted on his implicit iconoclasm and formed an explicit criticism of the Eastern use of icons. But his critique shed ample light on his ignorance, and further emphasized his need of Eastern counsel.
No comments:
Post a Comment